A handicapping analysis
Introduction
According to Wikipedia, a handicap race is “a race in which horses carry different weights, allocated by the handicapper”.
On March 4th 2020 18 Westies ran the In The Dark Handicap from the Kilpatrick gasworks (55.927112, -4.449228) to The Slacks (55.945192, -4.455503). The course was 5.6km in length. Audrey’s train was delayed so she missed the start.
The weather was fine, and the combined effect of a half moon and the bright lights of Greater Glasgow rendered head torches unnecessary for some.
Methods
Start, finish and running times were derived from Provan (2020; available at https://westerlandsccc.co.uk/in-the-dark-handicap-10/).
Results
Graeme Hall was the overall winner, in a respectable 35:45. Joe Waite posted the fasted time, in 30:51. Ella Peters was the fastest lady, in 35:06
Figure 1 illustrates the relationship between relative start time (x-axis, with first starters to the left) and overall running time (y-axis, with fastest finishers to the bottom). As expected, there is a strong negative relationship, with faster runners starting later. The slope of this line is close to -1, suggesting the organisers knew what they were doing; on average, runners were delayed by 1.068 minutes (0.40-1.73 95% confidence interval) for every minute faster they ended up finishing. Nonetheless, there is substantial variation around the regression line (R² = 0.42), indicating that some runners were given a more advantageous start time (blue points) than others (red).
Discussion
This analysis leads to two key conclusions: 1) the handicappers did a good job of assigning weights to horses (substantially better than if weights were assigned at random). 2) Nonetheless, some horses were unnecessarily overburdened, whilst others were treated more leniently.
This research could be of use to future handicappers. In particular, it could serve to identify individuals in need of a heavier weights, though further research is clearly needed.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank S Taylor, J Provan and H MacPherson for marking the course, recording timings and organising prizes.
This is excellent, though it could do with a clarifying list of shoes worn so one could take into account the ‘Alphafly effect’.
I would really like to see the wikipedia version of this run but with humans. Starting at say, in 0.5KG intervals?
Nice work Tom… Here some other values to help with the weighting and to get that regression line more accurate
1) new members
2) first timers
3) points 1 and 2 combined
4) conditions
Good analysis Tom!
This was an excellent use of time Tom!
There is clear evidence here of the Ruddick effect on handicapping.
I’ve never read anything as offensive as this dry, fact-based account.